Re up ici aussi
(http://www.speedtest.net/result/4096759922.png)
mais le ping local n'est pas génial
bizarre...
PING k-net.fr (178.250.209.47): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 178.250.209.47: icmp_seq=0 ttl=61 time=3708.315 ms
64 bytes from 178.250.209.47: icmp_seq=1 ttl=61 time=2.839 ms
64 bytes from 178.250.209.47: icmp_seq=2 ttl=61 time=2.891 ms
64 bytes from 178.250.209.47: icmp_seq=3 ttl=61 time=4.058 ms
64 bytes from 178.250.209.47: icmp_seq=4 ttl=61 time=2.912 ms
64 bytes from 178.250.209.47: icmp_seq=5 ttl=61 time=2.769 ms
64 bytes from 178.250.209.47: icmp_seq=6 ttl=61 time=2.853 ms
64 bytes from 178.250.209.47: icmp_seq=7 ttl=61 time=2.771 ms
64 bytes from 178.250.209.47: icmp_seq=8 ttl=61 time=2.849 ms
64 bytes from 178.250.209.47: icmp_seq=9 ttl=61 time=2.864 ms
10 packets transmitted, 10 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 2.769/373.512/3708.315/1111.601 ms
(http://www.speedtest.net/result/4096759922.png)
mais le ping local n'est pas génial
bizarre...
PING k-net.fr (178.250.209.47): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 178.250.209.47: icmp_seq=0 ttl=61 time=3708.315 ms
64 bytes from 178.250.209.47: icmp_seq=1 ttl=61 time=2.839 ms
64 bytes from 178.250.209.47: icmp_seq=2 ttl=61 time=2.891 ms
64 bytes from 178.250.209.47: icmp_seq=3 ttl=61 time=4.058 ms
64 bytes from 178.250.209.47: icmp_seq=4 ttl=61 time=2.912 ms
64 bytes from 178.250.209.47: icmp_seq=5 ttl=61 time=2.769 ms
64 bytes from 178.250.209.47: icmp_seq=6 ttl=61 time=2.853 ms
64 bytes from 178.250.209.47: icmp_seq=7 ttl=61 time=2.771 ms
64 bytes from 178.250.209.47: icmp_seq=8 ttl=61 time=2.849 ms
64 bytes from 178.250.209.47: icmp_seq=9 ttl=61 time=2.864 ms
10 packets transmitted, 10 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 2.769/373.512/3708.315/1111.601 ms